Henri Paul :Lord Stevens team have failed to come up with any credible explanation for the level of 20.7% Carbon Monoxide level found in the sample of blood

Why the blood samples taken at that time are unreliable. Why Al Fayed barristers will easily establish some kind of reasonable doubt in the jury's mind .

1) Five samples of blood were allegedly taken from Paul's body, they were all processed and dealt with in precisely the same way

2) Two of those samples were sent off to different laboratories for testing, and the remaining three were kept at the Institute where the autopsy was carried out.

3) The two samples tested both allegedly showed identical and excessive samples of Alcohol. One of those same samples was also tested for Carbon Monoxide and showed a level of 20.7% Although it was said in the report made at the time that the unused remains of the samples actually tested would be stored and preserved, it was eventually claimed during court proceedings in Paris that in fact there is nothing left of those two samples. Accordingly, there have been no DNA tests on the two samples which were used as the basis for the Alcohol levels and as the basis for the allegation that Paul was drunk.

3) The authorities and the Lord Stevens team have failed to come up with any credible explanation for the level of 20.7% Carbon Monoxide level found in the sample of blood which was not only tested for Alcohol but also for Carbon Monoxide.

All the international experts retained by Mr Al Fayed, as well as, so we are told, those retained by the police accept that Henri Paul could not have had that level of Carbon Monoxide.

That is why virtually every expert who has been involved say that it is most unlikely that this blood could have come from Henri Paul.
4) Three unused and untested samples of blood allegedly taken from Henri Paul's body on the night of 31st August should still remain. However, in the Paris Court proceeding, Professor Lecompte has confirmed on oath and under examination that in fact she only took three samples of blood from Henri Paul's body on 31 August.

Why did the record books made under his supervision show five samples if only three were taken from Henri Paul, and where did the other two come from?

No one has been able to explain this.

Were these additional ones the two that were sent off for testing and which not only showed the high Alcohol level but also the impossibly high Carbon Monoxide level.

If Henri Paul had actually had that combination of Alcohol and Carbon Monoxide level, he could not have stood, let alone drive.

5) The three unused samples which were never sent for testing probably did come from Henri Paul.

These are probably the three which Professor Lecompte now confirms she took.

It is one of those samples which has been tested for DNA which is why the tests show that it almost certainly came from Henri Paul.

The ones sent in 1997 for Alcohol testing do not now exist and have never been tested for DNA. 'No blood ever used for alcohol testing has ever been DNA tested'.

Whatever was left over from that blood has been destroyed so that it cannot be now tested for DNA.

6) A further sample of blood was taken from Henri Paul's body 4 days later (on 4th September 1997) in front of the French investigating Judge, Herve Stephan.

This was sent off to Dr Pepin,the same toxicologist who had carried out the original Alcohol/Carbon Monoxide test, and who in fact owned the laboratory.

Apart from the 4 day time difference, this blood sample was taken using a different method and taken from a from a completely different part of the body.

Top International experts agree that, under those circumstances, no one should have obtained a closely similar or identical Alcohol reading to the blood taken on 31st August, 2007.

But amazingly, the person to whom they were sent, the self same Dr. Pepin, allegedly obtained an almost identical figure. Even more incredible is the fact that the unused remains of that blood also allegedly no longer exist and so cannot be tested for Henri Paul's DNA!

7) The samples allegedly all taken at the same time from Henri Paul are, we now know, in different sorts of bottles, some have typed labels and some have handwritten labels.

There is even evidence of someone else's name having been scratched out on one and Henri Paul's name written in.

Henri Paul's Parents Fight Back

The parents of Henri Paul, the driver blamed for the car crash that killed Princess Diana almost five years ago, launched a legal campaign last week in an attempt to clear their son's name.

Within hours of the announcement by Jean and Gisele Paul, Mohammed Al Fayed, whose son Dodi was also killed in the wreck along with Paul, instructed his lawyers to launch "a parallel legal action on the same issue."

The legal moves by the Pauls and Al Fayed are aimed at forcing French authorities to turn over blood samples taken during the autopsy of Henri Paul for independent analysis and DNA testing. The Pauls believe the blood samples used to prove their son was drunk on the night of the infamous crash, were mixed up in a busy Paris morgue and do not belong to their son.

"We want to know the truth. We're certain that our son wasn't drunk," Paul's mother, Gisele Paul, told BBC radio. "We don't accept it. ... They say parents can be biased, but everyone he knew would say the same."

Gisele Paul said 30 autopsies were done at a Paris morgue on the day Paul's body was taken there. "You can imagine how they could have been mixed up. You can see how there could have been a mistake," she told the BBC.
 
"They said his liver was in perfect condition and we would have known, we would have seen, if he had been drinking." she said. "On the 28th of August he passed his medical exam for his pilot's licence. Everything was fine. Three days later he was labelled alcoholic."
 
Al Fayed has always contested the French court's findings, which exonerated photographers who were pursuing the princess's car August 31, 1997. He told reporters he had been refused permission for his own scientists to test the samples in the past and remained convinced that the blood sample was switched.
 
The Pauls insist that the blood samples showing their son's BAC level at .175 were not from his blood, because the high level of carbon monoxide found in the tested blood would have made him incapable of walking, much less driving a car.
 
But the blood tests were not the only evidence pointing to Henri Paul's intoxication on the night of the crash. Hair samples showed he had been drinking for at least a week and had been on prescription drugs for months.
 
Earlier tests showed that Henri Paul's blood contained "sub-therapeutic levels" of tiapride -- a drug commonly used in the treatment of alcoholics -- which he had apparently stopped taking.
 
Also, independent investigations by CNN and Time magazine found that Henri Paul started bar-hopping at 4 o'clock that afternoon and continued to drink even after being called back to work at the Paris Ritz Hotel at 10 p.m.
 
"Historically the impression left was that our son was Princess Diana's assassin. That's false," said Jean Paul.

http://alcoholism.about.com/cs/diana/a/aa020803a.htm

Princess Diana : Squidgygate

Diana confirmed that the conversation did take place and the tape was genuine. With the knowledge we now have it is very clear Diana was hacked by the SUN newspaper.

http://dianaunlawfullkilling.blogspot.com/2011/12/diana-and-oliver-hoare.html


Oliver Hoare - A Close Friend Of Diana's - It Would Appear Also Hacked By The Sun Newspaper

http://themurdochempireanditsnestofvipers.blogspot.com/2011/12/hackgate-oliver-hoare-hacked-by-sun.html

Diana: The Final Word? Inquest Documentary following Unlawful Killing verdict 2008

Martyn Gregory, author of the acclaimed book about the death of Diana: 'Diana: the Last Days' covered the Inquest every week during its six month duration for Sky News. Once the jury had returned an Unlawful Killing verdict due to the negligence of Henri Paul and the Papparazzi, the conspiracy theories had been finally debunked. He presented this documentary reviewing the evidence that led to the Inquest verdict.

The interviews include Kez Wingfield, the second bodyguard who was assigned to look after Dodi and Diana on the fatal night, reveals it was Mr Al Fayed who approved the plan for their exit from the Ritz. Diana's former London police bodyguard Ken Wharfe offers his opinion on the plan.

Claude Roulet, the former Deputy Director of the Ritz, who was in charge of the Hotel that day as the Director was on vacation, states he saw Henri Paul in a bar that evening before he returned to the Hotel. He also gives an account of his last conversation with Henri Paul.

Dr Robert Forrest, a professor of forensic toxicology, gives his analysis of how much Henri Paul had had to drink before he took the wheel.

The driver who brought the Mercedes up from the car park to the back of the Ritz reveals he was ordered to give the keys to Henri Paul despite him not having the qualifications to drive Diana and Dodi.

Claude Roulet says the professional chauffeurs who could have driven Diana and Dodi noticed Henri Paul was not his normal self.

The Police Officer who led the French investigation between 1997 and 1999, Commander Jean-Claude Mules, states it was obvious it was a straightforward car crash and what came afterwards were nothing more than allegations with no evidence to support them. He then speaks of his contact with James Andanson.

Martyn Gregory then goes on to touch upon the allegations surrounding 'Flash before the Crash' and the time it took to get Diana to the hospital.

Diana's close friend Rosa Monckton who went on holiday with Diana two weeks before she died, gives some insight into Diana's feelings for Dodi. There is then an astonishing revelation about what was said about the supposed engagement ring that is now on display in Harrods, backed up by Claude Roulet who collected the ring from the Repossi jewellers.

Martyn Gregory explains how CCTV destroyed the fabrication that Diana and Dodi planned to live together. Diana's friend Rosa Monckton then gives her own delicate evidence proving she couldn't have been pregnant. Pregnancy turns out to be the allegation that is fatal to the conspiracy theorists' case.

Martyn Gregory then springs a Roger Cook style surprise interview on Mohammed Fayed as he leaves the Royal Courts of Justice in London on the day the Jury formally repelled his claims of murder. Fayed remains uncharacteristically silent, however.

What I notice about this documentary is that it interviews people who were present at the time of the events under analysis and most of them met or knew Diana very close to her death. The pro-conspiracy theory documentaries almost always only feature people who were far away and had no direct connection at all to events and are mere armchair commentators.

With the inquest now over, I hope we can move on from Diana's death and can now fondly remember and celebrate her life. It is a shame that her death was tarnished by false and often absurd allegations that all had a self-serving purpose for Mohammed Fayed.

Footnote : Martin Gregory Is A MURDOCH Stooge ,Did You Notice He Never Once Mentioned The Fact Carbon Monoxide Was Found In The Bloodstream Of Henri Paul !

Schoolboy NOT Diana Was Oliver Hoare Phone Pest

A SCHOOLBOY waging a bullying campaign against another was responsible for many of the "obsessive" telephone calls to the home of art dealer Oliver Hoare that were attributed to the Princess of Wales.

During her Panorama interview last week, the Princess said "a young boy" was the source of up to 300 nuisance calls made to Mr Hoare's home in 1992 and 1993, but she did not identify the boy.

Inquiries by the Independent on Sunday have established that the calls were made by a 16-year-old pupil of Stowe School in Buckinghamshire. It is understood the boy, who has since been expelled, made the calls to one of Mr Hoare's sons, either Tristan, 17, or Damien, 15, who attended the school.

The Princess's insistence that she did not make the calls was an important part of her defence against suggestions from what she called "the enemy" - the Prince of Wales's friends - that she was unstable.

The story of the calls broke last year after the Princess was implicated in a police investigation into nuisance calls made to the London home of Mr Hoare over an 18-month period. It emerged that the Princess's private line at Kensington Palace, her mobile phone, the home of her sister, Lady Sarah McCorquodale, and several call-boxes in the area featured on the list of numbers being looked at by police. She denied making the calls, in which the caller said nothing before replacing the receiver.

Mr Hoare, 50, called in the police in October 1993, and police say the calls stopped last March, but not before the Princess's reputation had been damaged.

In her Panorama interview, the Princess admitted making some calls to Mr Hoare, a family friend, but she added: "I was reputed to have made 300 telephone calls in a very short space of time, which, bearing my lifestyle at that time, made me a very busy lady. No I didn't, I didn't. That again was a huge move to discredit me, and very nearly did me in, the injustice of it, because I did my own homework on that subject and consequently found out that a young boy had done most of them."

A source close to the Princess said: "There appears to have been some conflict between one of Mr Hoare's sons and another boy at the school, who is now 17. The latter made a lot of calls from phone boxes in the Kensington, Bayswater and Notting Hill areas of London. These were the ones that some people suspected Diana was using. There was some bullying and it appears the calls were ... a form of harassment."

Stowe School refused to comment. A spokeswoman said: "We have students removed from time to time, just like other schools. But our policy is not to disclose who they are or why they were removed."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/schoolboy-with-a-grudge-was-oliver-hoare-telephone-pest-1583656.html

Diana And Oliver Hoare

AS ELEGANT AND DISCREET AS ITS owner, Oliver Hoare's Ahuan Gallery is a curiously uninviting place these days. On posh Eccleston Street in London's Belgravia, the gallery where Hoare, 49, sold Islamic art to clients including Queen Noor of Jordan and the Sultan of Brunei looks deserted: No one answers the door, and the reception desk is unattended. A month after London papers broke the story that the dashing Hoare had received over 300 anonymous phone calls believed to be from the Princess of Wales, the only artifact in the display window is, symbolically, a suit of armor.

Since being pegged as the man with whom the princess is obsessed, Hoare has found himself under attack from all sides. Fleet Street's finest have been camping out at the $3.5 million house on Chelsea's fashionable Tregunter Road where he lives with wife Diane, 46, and their children Tristan, 17, Damien, 15, and Olivia, 12. Tabloids are gleefully reporting that, instead of being a family man who merely offered a sympathetic shoulder to Diana when her marriage was foundering, Hoare is a compulsive charmer who had a fiery liaison with a Turkish-born socialite. And behind the scenes, insiders are hinting that his relationship with Di, 33, may not have been platonic. "The consensus is that they definitely had an affair," says one seasoned Di-watcher. "No question about it. Diana became completely besotted with him."

Palace-watchers also claim that Prince Charles and longtime lover Camilla Parker Bowles (also a close friend of Hoare's) knew of the alleged affair and Di's phone calls six months before the story emerged in the press. In the words of Daily Mail columnist Nigel Dempster, Charles's knowledge of the "burgeoning friendship" between Di and Hoare made Charles feel "less constrained in making his admission... that he had broken his marriage vows"—a confession offered in an interview with freelance broadcaster Jonathan Dimbleby on ITV last June.

Hoare's professional life has come under scrutiny as well. In recent weeks, London has learned that his gallery has been losing money heavily—as much as $700,000 last year—and that he once sold a valuable page from an early Koran that proved to have been stolen. Though colleagues who will speak on the record characterize his business dealings as "utterly beyond reproach," it came to light following a 1989 burglary at his gallery that Hoare had overinsured some antiques for more than 10 times their real value.

On Sept. 7 the tale became still more tantalizing when nude photos of Charles, who is close to both Hoare and his wife, were published by the German paper Bild Zeitung. As it happened, Charles was on a solitary holiday at a chateau near Avignon, France, owned by Diane Hoare's mother, Baroness Louise de Waldner, when paparazzi caught him toweling off in his bedroom. Besides creating an uproar over the intrusion, the incident demonstrated just how close the two families are—and how little Charles seemed to mind that his wife has been under Hoare's spell. Says one royal-watcher: "The fact that he was prepared to stay at the villa while the story was unfolding is evidence that he's still friendly with Oliver. I don't think Charles really cares if [Hoare] was having an affair with Diana or not." Adds Lady Colin Campbell, author of Diana, the Princess Nobody Knows: "Why would Charles mind? He has nothing to do with the woman. The fact that he knew of the affair is a sign of his complete indifference."

In the wake of these embarrassments, Hoare retreated to the safety of his antique-filled home, where he vents his frustrations in what he calls his screaming room—a soundproof haven where he copes with stress by yelling at the top of his lungs. He emerged from his house briefly on Aug. 28 for a stroll with son Damien, but politely declined to answer questions from the press.

As friends tell it, the man whom Diana chose as a confidant has always been known for his discretion. "He's an old-fashioned gentleman," says Dale Egee, proprietor of a London gallery called Egee Art Consultancy. "He has a very scholarly background and a retiring, even vulnerable manner that is very appealing to women."

The son of Reginald Hoare, a civil servant, and his wife, Irina, Hoare studied at the Sorbonne after graduating from Eton in 1963. Fascinated with Iran, he found a mentor in Princess Hamoush Azodi-Bowler, who invited him to stay at the Tehran mansion where she played host to a circle of artistic young aristocrats. (It was there that Hoare met business partner David Sulzberger, whose family owns The New York Times.) "Everybody loved him," Azodi-Bowler told the Daily Mail. "He played the guitar and sang beautifully...[at parties] he would dedicate different songs to different women."

Described by a friend who spoke to the Daily Mail as an "extravagantly pretty" young man "who would turn the heads of both men and women," Hoare began to move in ever more exalted circles. After returning to London he set up a gallery that attracted customers including Rudolf Nureyev and in 1974 began wooing Diane de Waldner, a French oil heiress whose mother is close to the Queen Mum.

It was eight years after the Hoares' 1976 wedding that Oliver met Charles at a Windsor Castle house party. The prince struck up a friendship with the worldly Hoare, who became a frequent visitor at Highgrove, Charles's home in Gloucestershire. By the late 1980s, Hoare had also befriended Diana, who shared his love of ballet.

That relationship seems not to have become close, however, until 1992, when Hoare helped to cushion the breakup for both Charles and Di. By that time, his own marriage was still recovering from his six-month fling with ex-beauty queen Ayesha Nadir, whose estranged husband, clothing tycoon Asil Nadir, had been a client. On Aug. 28, Ayesha, now divorced, told the News of the World that the affair began in 1986, when Hoare offered her solace after she learned that Nadir's mistress had borne him two children. Traced to her villa on the Bosphorus, Hoare's ex-lover (who reportedly left him after concluding that he would never divorce Diane) told The Evening Standard, "Oliver is such a refined man. It is hard to resist his charms."

Di, too, apparently found Hoare difficult to resist. "I think she fell in love with Oliver, maybe because she's never been loved properly," Ayesha told the News of the World. Though it is unclear just when—or whether—the two had a physical relationship, Diana seems to have been infatuated with Hoare by September 1992, three months before the Waleses separated and the anonymous calls began. Although Diana reportedly was silent whenever Hoare answered, she is said to have shouted "a stream of abuse" when Diane picked up the phone.

Although most Di-watchers feel that she made the calls simply to hear Hoare's voice, Campbell believes that Diane may have been the target. "[Diana] made those calls to taunt her because she's jealous," says Campbell. (That notion was supported by recent reports that, for years, Parker Bowles received silent calls that she claims were from her royal rival.) For her part, Diane reportedly believed that the relationship between Di and her husband was getting out of hand; Dempster said recently that she told Charles that Hoare had "had an affair" with Diana.

In any case, it was Diane (whose money reportedly is helping to offset her husband's business difficulties) who demanded that Hoare ask the police to investigate. Still, he declined to press charges after he discovered last January who his caller was, and he apparently did not abandon the princess. According to The Sun, Hoare (who was still serving as a liaison between the Waleses) called Diana "at least 15 times" in the days following a March 14 dinner with friends at a Chinese restaurant, after which he returned with her to the palace. "A royal source" told the paper that one call last April "started at around 8:30 at night and went on for close to [90 minutes]. Who knows what was being talked about, but they obviously had plenty on their minds."

At the moment, the charismatic Hoare seems to be hoping that lying low will solve at least one of his problems—that of being stalked by a rowdy crowd of newsmen. Whether it can quell Diana's obsession remains to be seen. Last month, the. News of the World reported that the distressed princess rang Hoare's home seven times during a four-day period in late August—after the tabloids had reported that she was hounding him. Telling the housekeeper that she had to "speak to [Oliver] urgently," the princess reportedly hung up when she was told it was impossible. In the weeks to come, it seems, that "screaming room" may come in handy.

http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20103997,00.html

Princess Diana Inquest : Video - The Framing Of Henri Paul

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/76617/Princess_Diana_Inquest__The_Framing_of_Henri_Paul/